Government Regulations Negatively Impact Banking Businesses
Signature Bank, a New York-based bank, recently failed due to government regulations on banking businesses. The bank regulators are responsible for auditing the “safety and soundness” of banks and ensuring their compliance with federal and state regulations. However, regulators should not dictate what businesses banks should be involved in.
The author, who created a commercial real estate lending department at Signature Bank with a successful business plan, retired from Signature due to concerns about the bank’s diversification and the regulators’ actions. The regulators became arrogant and incompetent during their audit and downgraded the risk ratings on loans based on false assumptions, which negatively affected the business. The regulators also insisted that Signature must diversify into other businesses despite having no background in operating a business or operating real property.
As a result of the regulators’ actions, they took over Signature Bank, causing the crypto companies to withdraw their deposits and creating a significant drop in liquidity. This increase in interest rates will have a disastrous effect on all types of loans and cause a recession. Moreover, this action by regulators will result in commercial and residential real estate values falling off a cliff and cause unemployment to increase.
The author believes that more banking regulations are not the solution, and less regulation would allow banks to run their businesses effectively.
FDIC Hires Newmark Group to Sell $60 Billion of Failed Lender Signature Bank’s Loans
The US banking industry has been affected by recent failures, including Signature Bank. In an effort to appease investors and reassure customers that their deposits are safe, FDIC has hired Newmark Group to sell Signature Bank’s loans worth $60 billion.
However, doubts over US Federal Reserve’s plans to aggressively hike interest rates have resulted in investors staying away from regional bank stocks. Sale of a loan book this large will affect the commercial property market. FDIC and Newmark Group declined to comment on the matter.
Signature Bank closed earlier this month, and as a result, Flagstar Bank assumed Signature Bank’s deposits, some of its loan portfolios and branches. However, FDIC told Signature Bank’s crypto clients to close their accounts and move their money. Signature Bank’s crypto clients have until April 5 to close their accounts.
New York’s financial regulator stated that the decision to close Signature Bank had nothing to do with crypto.
Customers of Signature Bank with Cryptocurrency Accounts Have Until April 5 to Close Their Accounts and Transfer Their Funds
The U.S. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp (FDIC) has notified Signature Bank’s cryptocurrency account holders to close their accounts and transfer their funds. However, Flagstar Bank’s rescue arrangement with Signature Bank did not cover cryptocurrency accounts made earlier this month.
Signature Bank’s payment network, Signet, is also excluded from the rescue agreement.
Barney Frank, a former U.S. representative on the board of Signature, stated that banks were reacting to a rise in regulatory hostility towards cryptocurrencies. Galaxy Digital CEO Mike Novogratz wants regulators to discuss A.I. rules rather than cryptocurrencies.
The closure of Signature Bank was not brought on by crypto but by its executives’ lack of transparent information. American financial regulators are suppressing the cryptocurrency industry, resulting in high-profile collapses, according to Katie Haun, founder of Haun Ventures and a member of the Coinbase board.
Moreover, international standards limiting banks’ crypto holdings may be revised depending on the market, according to the head of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision.
In conclusion, government regulations have negatively impacted banking businesses such as Signature Bank. The failure of this bank has affected not only its clientele but also cryptocurrency account holders who are now required to close their accounts and transfer their funds somewhere else. Banks should be allowed more freedom in their decision-making and less regulation in order to run their businesses effectively. The suppression of the cryptocurrency industry by American financial regulators needs to be revised, and the regulations need to be more transparent in order to avoid more collapses in the future.
Image Source: Wikimedia Commons
