The Background
A civil trial stemming from a 2016 ski collision involving actress Gwyneth Paltrow and retired optometrist Terry Sanderson is currently underway in Utah. Sanderson is seeking more than $300,000 in damages and has accused Paltrow of causing the collision that resulted in him sustaining four broken ribs and brain damage from a concussion. However, Paltrow has countered his claims, testifying that Sanderson skied into her.
The Testimonies
In closing arguments, Sanderson’s attorney rejected claims that Sanderson is seeking fame and attention, saying he “never came home the same” after the collision. Paltrow’s attorney asserted in closing that it would be “wrong” to award Sanderson any money as he hurt Paltrow. During the trial, both parties presented their cases and testified about the incident. Paltrow described hearing a “grunting noise” before they both came crashing down, while Sanderson testified that he got hit hard in his back and saw a lot of snow after the collision.
The Counterclaims
Paltrow is counter-suing for $1 in damages plus attorneys’ fees as she claims that the ski collision was not her fault. Her attorneys have painted Sanderson as an “obsessed” man pushing “utter BS” claims against someone vulnerable to frivolous lawsuits. They have also tried to discredit Sanderson’s accusations by claiming he is trying to exploit Paltrow’s celebrity and wealth.
The Jury Deliberations
The eight-member jury began deliberations on Thursday after hearing testimony from expert witnesses, ski resort employees, and even Paltrow’s two children, Apple and Moses Martin. Both sides have marshaled significant resources with the verdict potentially receiving worldwide attention.
The Impact
The trial has shone a spotlight on Park City, an upscale ski resort that welcomes celebrities such as Paltrow for the Sundance film festival. The case has also highlighted issues surrounding ski safety, including the responsibility of skiers and how to prevent collisions on slopes. If Sanderson is awarded damages, it could set a precedent for future ski-related lawsuits.
In conclusion, the outcome of this civil trial will have significant implications not only for Paltrow and Sanderson but also for the larger skiing community. With both sides presenting convincing arguments, the jury’s decision is eagerly awaited.
Image Source: Wikimedia Commons
