The ongoing conflict in Ukraine between government forces and Russian-backed separatists has received much attention from the international community, with debates surrounding military aid and weapon systems sending to the region becoming increasingly heated. The US and Germany recently agreed to send tanks to Ukraine, clearing the way for other European allies to send military vehicles. The debates around each new weapon have served as a proxy for a serious inquiry into what the US is doing in Ukraine.
Averting nuclear use and avoiding war
The primary interest of the Biden administration in the conflict is averting nuclear use and avoiding a direct war between NATO and Russia. Each tranche of weapons that the US has sent to Ukraine tells us a lot about the administration’s approach to the war at any given time. The Biden administration has committed $47 billion of military assistance to Ukraine, leading some experts to support arming Ukraine to the maximum, while others argue for caution to avoid inadvertent escalation of the conflict.
Success of calibrated approach
The success of the Biden administration’s calibrated approach has led to a more serious conversation about the issues at stake, including the importance of Ukraine to the United States and Ukraine’s potential membership in NATO. The perils of groupthink must be avoided, and dissenting opinions must be considered in weapons debates. The debates around weapons serve as a proxy for a bigger conversation about the risks and realities of war.
Reevaluation of munitions stockpiling by US Navy and Marine Corps
The rate at which Ukrainians are firing at Russian invaders has prompted a reevaluation of munitions stockpiling by US Navy and Marine Corps for future conflicts. Stockpile reevaluation was prompted by expenditure rates in Ukraine that contradicted Navy’s expectations of lower rates due to technological advancements in weapons. Marine Corps Commandant Gen. David Berger pointed out that conflicts can last for more than a few days and require more munitions for which the assumptions on stockpiling need to be reassessed.
The United States has already provided tens of thousands of munitions and several weapon systems to Ukraine, which has helped it stay in the fight despite causing depletion of US’ own stockpiles. The Pentagon is working on expanding and increasing production of weapons and munitions with defense companies due to the depletion of stockpiles to continue providing support to Ukraine. Navy Secretary Carlos Del Toro emphasized the need to increase munitions across the board due to Navy’s expenditure of munitions to support Ukraine and promised support. Multi-year procurement contracts for munitions have been praised as they will provide the industry with the necessary certainty to make the transition from just-in-time to just-in-case stockpiles.
Innovating America’s Munitions Industry
While debates surrounding military aid for Ukraine continue, there is a larger conversation taking place about the state of America’s Munitions Industry. The foundation of every explosive device in the military, America’s energetics industry has been largely ignored since the mid-1950s compared to China and other emerging world powers that have brought new energetics technologies and industrial facilities online.
With rising threats from Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and China, there has been a much-needed investment in revitalizing the American munitions industry. The Pentagon must balance investing in underfunded manufacturing assets while updating munitions with modern materials and methods. Investing in advanced chemistry and new chemical formulations can offer critical advantages to the munitions industry, especially as new nano aluminum solid composite propellant offers a 20% boost in basic rocket performance that is easier to handle and more highly controllable than legacy energetics.
However, scaling these innovations is a real financial challenge for research-oriented companies like Helicon Chemical in the energetics industry. Therefore, incentivizing existing programs to try new energetics to enhance critical Pentagon tools and offer users big capability improvements is important. Establishing a Joint Energetics Transition Office will be critical in advancing the innovation needed to sustain today’s massive investment in the American munitions infrastructure.
In conclusion, debates around military aid for Ukraine have sparked a larger conversation surrounding America’s approach to war and investments in its munitions industry. As threats from Russia and China continue to rise, it is important that the US maintains a careful balance between investing in underfunded manufacturing assets while also innovating with new materials and methods to keep up with emerging world powers.
Image Source: Wikimedia Commons
